SLO burn-rate example: comparing one hour and five minutes
Explore a two-window burn-rate checkpoint using a 99.9% SLO and illustrative event counts.
Illustrative dataset · Tool version 2 · Reviewed September 29, 2026
Is the higher error rate visible in both windows?
Both illustrative windows have 1.5% bad events against a 0.1% allowed fraction, producing 15× burn. The long window has 1,500 bad events out of 100,000 over one hour; the short window has 150 out of 10,000 over five minutes. Both exceed the example 14.4× checkpoint. Over a 30-day period, the long window represents about 2.08% normalized budget spend.
| Window | Burn rate |
|---|---|
| One hour | 15× |
| Five minutes | 15× |
What this example does not establish
Windows must end together and use the same SLI. This demonstrates threshold arithmetic, not a deployed alert or measured remaining rolling budget. Variable traffic changes the interpretation of normalized spend.
Try a variation
Open the example, change one input, and review the result. Keep definitions and denominators constant when comparing scenarios. Save a named draft before changing to a different dataset.
Read the related guide · Source and further reading
These datasets and worksheets may be adapted for your team or training. Attribute AIOpsSRE and link to this example when redistributing. Third-party sources retain their own terms.
Get AIOpsSRE by email · Report a calculation or explanation issue